Thoughts Serializer

Computer graphics, Games, Personal

Predictable garbage collection with Lua

3 Comments »

In one of my previous posts I talked about how you can make the Lua garbage collector (GC) more predictable in running time. This is a virtue that is highly valued in a GC used in games where you don’t have the luxury of going over you frame time. In that post I described a solution to the problem which works fine most of the time, leaving little space for garbage collection times that will hurt the framerate. However I ended that post with a promise to provide a better solution and in this post, I deliver.

The ideal situation would be to have the GC run for a specific amount of time. This way the game engine will be able to assign exact CPU time to the GC based on the situation. For example one strategy would be to give a constant amount of time to the GC per frame. Lets say 2ms every frame. Or it can be more clever and take into consideration other parameters, like the amount of time it took to do the actual frame. Is there enough time left for this frame? If there is, spend some for GC, if not, hold it for the next frame when things might not be too tight. Other parameters can be memory thresholds, memory warnings, etc.

All of the above depend on a GC that can be instructed to run for an exact amount of time. This kind of GC is what we call a realtime GC. And Lua does not have one. However it turns out that we can get very close to realtime with minor changes to the Lua GC.

The patch below modifies the behavior of the GC in the way we need it:

--- a/src/lgc.c
+++ b/src/lgc.c
@@ -609,15 +617,14 @@ static l_mem singlestep (lua_State *L) {
 
 void luaC_step (lua_State *L) {
   global_State *g = G(L);
-  l_mem lim = (GCSTEPSIZE/100) * g->gcstepmul;
-  if (lim == 0)
-    lim = (MAX_LUMEM-1)/2;  /* no limit */
   g->gcdept += g->totalbytes - g->GCthreshold;
+  double start = getTime();
+  double end = start + (double)g->gcstepmul / 1000.0;  
   do {
-    lim -= singlestep(L);
+    singlestep(L);
     if (g->gcstate == GCSpause)
       break;
-  } while (lim > 0);
+  } while (getTime() < end);
   if (g->gcstate != GCSpause) {
     if (g->gcdept < GCSTEPSIZE)
       g->GCthreshold = g->totalbytes + GCSTEPSIZE;  /* - lim/g->gcstepmul;*/

The only missing part from the patch above is the getTime() that can be something like this:

double getTime() {
    struct timeval tp;
    gettimeofday(&tp, NULL);
    return (tp.tv_sec) + tp.tv_usec/1000000.0;
}

I guess however that everyone will want to use their own time function.

The patch modifies the code so that is stops based on a time limit and not based on a calculated target memory amount to be freed. The simplicity of the patch also comes from the fact that we “reuse” the STEPMUL parameter that is no longer used to carry the aggressiveness of the GC. We now use it to hold the exact duration we want the GC to run in milliseconds. So the usage will be this:

lua_gc(L, LUA_GCSETSTEPMUL, gcMilliSeconds);
lua_gc(L, LUA_GCSTEP, 0);

The above code will run the GC for gcMilliSeconds ms. This way you will never be out of your frame time budget, because the garbage collection took a little longer to execute. Problem solved!

From Python to Lua

1 Comment »

(This blog was originaly posted at #AltDevBlogADay)

All game developers, sooner or later, learn to appreciate scripting languages. That magical thing that allows for letting others do your job, better scaling of the team, strengthening the game code/engine separation, sandboxing, faster prototyping of ideas, fault isolation, easy parametrization, etc. Every game has to be somehow data driven to be manageable, and stopping at simple configuration files, with many different custom parsers, without going the extra mile of adding a full scripting language, is 90% of the times a bad design choice. 

Today the developer can choose from a large variety of scripting languages, or even go crazy and implement one on his own. It happens that the most favored language for game developers is Lua. Its easy to understand why Lua is the favorite but other options are used as well. For example Python and the lately upcoming force of  Javascript.

Here I would like to share some of my experience of moving a game engine from Python to Lua. Read the rest of this entry »

Optimizing script language performance with custom memory allocators

2 Comments »

The last weekend I did some exploration on the script language execution performance. Specifically on the memory allocation side of things, and I would like to share my findings.

Script languages and memory usage

As you probably know script languages (most of them at least, like Python, Lua, etc) have the tendency to make a huge amount of small allocations on the heap. Almost everything is stored on the heap, and if you care for performance, you start to feel homesick about your beloved C stack! Anyway, nothing comes for free, and scripting languages have to take something from you in exchange for all the goods it gives you back. So the best you can do is make sure that you have the best memory allocator for the job.

Doing too many small allocations and releases on the heap can create memory fragmentation, along with all the evil that comes with this. The common approach is to create a specialized memory allocator that serves small and constant in size blocks of memory to the scripting language, taken from a bigger chunk of memory reserved from the system. This is a common in all “realtime” and intencive applications like games, and something I did many times to gain performance.

Can’t beat the standard malloc

What I discovered with my latest attempt was that it has gotten quite hard to beat the GNU implementation of malloc(). Something that used to be easy in the past when you focused on a specialized case (e.g. small blocks of memory). Not that you can’t do better if you try hard, but at this point the malloc() implementation is already super-fast for 99.9% of applications on the desktop. Rest asured that you will not be able to do much better. However that is not the case for embedded devices that don’t share the same virtual memory benefits as the desktop computers.

My hand tuned specialized memory allocator for small blocks of memory ( <= 256bytes ) was not able to be more that 1% faster that the native malloc() on the OS X 10.6. However on the iPhone the same allocator was twice as fast as the native malloc() ! Since the target was from the begining the iPhone that seemed like big win! However when I set up a small benchmark in the scripting environment that did some allocations of game engine objects and released then again in various patterns, the results were disappointing. The gain from using my specialized (and twice as fast) allocator resulted in improvement of about 5% in execution speed in a memory intensive benchmark. And at some tests even slower! That was odd and most of all not good!

Why I was failing

After some inspections and tests that made the case of me doing something really stupid less probable, I narrowed down the cause.

In most cases of using a scripting language you have some classes defined in C++ that you instatiate in the scripting language. Take for example a 3D vector class “CVector3″ defined in C++. When you instatiate this in the script language you get two allocations. One in the scripting language that allocates the “proxy” object and one in the C++ environment. When giving a new allocator to the scripting language to do its allocations you only “optimize” the first allocation. The one in C++ still goes through the system default allocator.

And since you optimize half of the allocations you expect to have half the performance boost… well… wrong. It turns out that you can even be slower this way. The secret here is the CPU cache. By doing the above, you have two memory blocks that are usually accessed together, but are far apart in memory. This can really hurt performance badly on a device with slow memory like the iPhone.

The solution

The solution was of course to use the same allocator on the C++ side by overriding the “new” operator of the class. This made the blocks of memory allocated on the script side to be close to the block allocated on the C++ side. This way access to the object only involves accessing one part of the memory and giving nice cache hits. Performance up by 30%, which was nice and expected.

One other interesting thing that I found from this is that, on the iPhone, if I just override the “new” operator of a class and make it allocate the memory with plain malloc() and don’t use my allocator at all, the system is again faster!

This is probably from the fact that “new” does not go through plain malloc() (didn’t bother to check) as the scripting language environment does. So the allocated blocks end up in differect arenas at different parts of the memory, with the result of losing performance for the same reason as above!

So, keep your related allocations close together when crossing the language barrier!

Having both Mac OSX and iPhone targets in XCODE

1 Comment »

I have a library (guess what that is!) for use in the iPhone. For the library I have an XCode project with two targets. One for the emulator and one for the actual device. Nothing wild as you can see.

However the joy came when I desided to also use the library in OSX. As one would guess I went on and created a new target for OSX, which started out as a copy of the original iPhone, target but with the “base SDK” for the specific target switched to “Mac OS X 10.6″.

When I compiled for the first time, I came to the realization that even with this option set to Mac OS X 10.6, xcode was still compiling for the iPhone! From this point on, nothing worked. I tried every option, setting, for the project and the target.. but nothing. XCode seemed locked to compile for the iPhone, totally ignoring the SDK setting. I ended up trying quiting/starting again XCode, restarting the MAC… and some other arcane spells and voodoo I can’t really confess here… nothing… Then I gave up and dreamed of the nice days of scons and even make files, when you knew what was under the hood..

All that until today when in a moment of enlightenment, I clicked on the “Overview” dropdown of XCode with the ALT key pressed. And “boom” (as Jobs would say), there is was… “the choise”! By holding ALT when selecting the “Overview dropdown, XCode allows you to choose the active SDK!  This was so overwhelming for me that I tweeted about it and also desided to make a blog post, so that no one has to go through what I did.

So bottom line for both OS X and iPhone targets:

  1. Make a new target for OS X and set it up.
  2. ALT-click the Overview to select your active SDK.
  3. Compile.
  4. Have a nice day!

Python Easter Egg

1 Comment »

Since Easter is coming, here is an easter egg for you :

If you type from __future__ import braces in Python..

You get :

SyntaxError: not a chance

:D :D :D

Ray Tracing into a Sparse Voxel Octree

4 Comments »

And just when you thought you were through with tracing things all over the place… John Carmack strikes back with a mortal blow with something about ray tracing into a sparse voxel octree!!

The article doesn’t really say much (nothing actually) about the algorithm, and this is where the fun/fuss starts! I can’t wait to see all the amazing/crazy ideas people from all over world will come up with, about what John is actually talking about. Plots over plots will emerge.. flames.. Read the rest of this entry »

NVIDIA to Acquire AGEIA Technologies

No Comments »

According to this press release, nVidia will acquire Ageia Technologies. Yeap! The well known physics software and hardware vendor. In my mind this means that the future nVidia based accelerators will support physics acceleration, too. It will basically mean the death of the PhysX processor, since the GPU can do that easily with no extra cost.

Actually the PPU solution was never to work. I find it quite hard to believe people would ever Read the rest of this entry »

Software Engineering Proverbs

1 Comment »

Must read.. :)

One I really liked :

Q: How many QA testers does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: QA testers don’t change anything. They just report that it’s dark.

My Βabbler Coldfusion

2 Comments »

If you where a compiler and you would like to express yourself about an index that was mistakenly out of bounds what would you say?

I would say something like this : - “Line 342 : Index out of bounds”

Read on to find out what Coldfusion would say!!! Read the rest of this entry »

Double Check Your EXCEL

1 Comment »

Do you trust Microsoft Excel to do your financial plans? Do you count on it for business matters? Do you even use it as a calculator?

Think again… since Excel can’t even multiply correctly!!

I wonder how they accomplished such a thing! What kind of COM, CORBA and VB should you be calling for a multiplication to make it have a bug!?

p.s. If I recall correctly there was a bug like that in the calculator that came with a previous version of Windows…

microsoft, excel, bug, multiply